Expertise · Critical Minerals Diplomacy & Strategic Governance
Advising Governments on the Strategic Governance of Critical-Minerals Partnerships
Critical minerals increasingly shape economic policy, investment relations, trade, industrial strategy, national security and international cooperation.
AABSA advises governments on the legal, regulatory, institutional and governance dimensions of strategic mineral partnerships.
Outcomes
What governments gain
01
Strategic partnerships grounded in domestic law and institutional capacity
02
A coordinated whole-of-government position
03
Long-term commitments with clear oversight, review and exit arrangements
Overview
Strategic Advisory Services
Areas may include:
- Government-to-government mineral cooperation
- Strategic mineral partnerships
- Bilateral and multilateral arrangements
- Legal review of strategic agreements
- Institutional coordination
- Cross-government decision-making
- Public-interest considerations
- Government negotiation support
- Regulatory implications
- Long-term commitments
- Implementation governance
- Strategic-risk assessment
Cooperation
Government-to-Government Cooperation
AABSA can advise on arrangements involving:
- Mineral supply
- Investment
- Infrastructure
- Processing
- Technology
- Industrial development
- Supply-chain security
- Capacity building
- Public-sector cooperation
Agreements
Legal Review of Strategic Agreements
Areas may include:
- Government authority
- Domestic-law implications
- Government commitments
- Regulatory undertakings
- Institutional obligations
- Implementation
- Reporting
- Review
- Amendment
- Dispute-management arrangements
- Duration and termination
Coordination
Cross-Government Coordination
AABSA helps governments coordinate institutions responsible for:
- Mines
- Finance
- Justice
- Foreign affairs
- Trade
- Investment
- Industry
- Environment
- Infrastructure
- Energy
- National planning
Risk
Strategic Risk
AABSA can assess:
- Government obligations
- Institutional mandates
- Regulatory constraints
- Implementation risk
- Overlapping commitments
- Governance weaknesses
- Oversight
- Institutional dependence
- Coordination
- Accountability